The Sue Gray report is published: Stephen Hammond interview

The transcript discusses a report's findings on unacceptable events and culture at number 10, highlighting the Prime Minister's lack of contrition in his response. It questions his ability to regain public trust and the potential impact on future elections, with some colleagues expressing concern over defending the indefensible.

What was the general tone of the report discussed in the House?

• It was an inconclusive report.

• It was a positive report.

• It was a neutral report.

• It was a damning report.

How did the Prime Minister begin his statement in response to the report?

• By denying the report's findings.

• By ignoring the report.

• By accepting responsibility.

• By blaming others.

What was the reaction to the Prime Minister's level of contrition in his statement?

• It was seen as very apologetic.

• It was considered sufficient.

• It was ignored by the public.

• It was surprising for its lack of contrition.

What concern did colleagues express about defending the Prime Minister?

• That it was almost impossible.

• That it was an easy task.

• That it was a popular decision.

• That it was unnecessary.

What is the potential political consequence mentioned if the situation does not change?

• Strengthening the Prime Minister's position.

• Gaining more public trust.

• Losing the next general election.

• Winning the next general election.