U.S. Needs to Take a Breath on Islamic State, Mideast

The transcript discusses Tom Friedman's article in the New York Times, which quotes George Friedman on US strategy against ISIS. The article suggests the US should minimize its involvement, pushing regional powers to take action. Concerns are raised about the lack of active participation from countries like Saudi Arabia and Turkey. The discussion highlights the need for more overt involvement from Middle Eastern countries and concludes with a note on the organization of elite troops linked to Saddam Hussein.

What is George Friedman's suggested strategy for the US in dealing with ISIS?

• Diplomatic negotiations

• Economic sanctions

• Minimal involvement and encouraging regional powers

• Direct military intervention

What concern does Tom Friedman express about the current approach to ISIS?

• The US is focusing too much on economic strategies

• The US is not addressing key questions about regional involvement

• The US is over-relying on European allies

• The US is not acting out of fear

Which countries are questioned for their lack of public action against ISIS?

• Egypt and Jordan

• Turkey and Saudi Arabia

• Iran and Iraq

• Lebanon and Syria

What is noted about the composition of ISIS troops?

• They are mostly inexperienced fighters

• They are elite troops with ties to Saddam Hussein's regime

• They are primarily foreign volunteers

• They are poorly organized

How has Turkey's stance been described in terms of its commitment to fighting ISIS?

• Fully committed and involved

• Cautious and circumspect

• Neutral and indifferent

• Aggressive and proactive