How Did H.K. Government Lose Hearts and Minds of People?

How Did H.K. Government Lose Hearts and Minds of People?

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the ongoing protests in Hong Kong, highlighting the government's failure to address public demands and the resulting collapse in public trust. It critiques the leadership of Carrie Lam and previous administrations, suggesting that a lack of political experience and responsiveness has exacerbated the situation. The text proposes potential solutions, including withdrawing the extradition bill, instituting an independent inquiry, and reopening political consultations. The discussion also touches on the broader implications for governance and public trust in Hong Kong.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What has been a significant consequence of the Hong Kong government's failure to address public demands?

Increased economic growth

Improved relations with Beijing

Collapse in public trust, especially in the police

Decrease in protest activities

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What could have potentially prevented the escalation of protests in Hong Kong?

Increased police presence

Immediate withdrawal of the extradition bill

More media coverage

Support from Beijing

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the key demands from the protesters that the government could address?

Reduction in police force

More public holidays

Independent Commission of inquiry

Increase in taxes

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a suggested action for the Hong Kong government to reconcile with the community?

Increase police funding

Reopen the political consultation process

Implement stricter laws

Reduce public spending

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might the Hong Kong chief executives struggle with political leadership?

They have too much public support

They have no political experience

They are elected by a small committee

They focus too much on international relations