Tech's History With the White House

Tech's History With the White House

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the unprecedented presence of tech leaders at a presidential inauguration, highlighting the evolving relationship between Silicon Valley and the Trump administration. It explores historical ties between tech and government, ethical questions, and the significant influence of tech leaders like Zuckerberg, Bezos, and Musk. The discussion emphasizes the potential of tech companies to shape history and the need for a balance between corporate power and public sector regulation.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was notable about the tech leaders' presence at the presidential inauguration?

They were not invited.

They were seated in the back.

It was the first time tech leaders were present.

They occupied a place of honor.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the Trump administration's approach to AI regulation differ from the Biden administration?

It promises a lighter regulatory hand.

It bans AI development.

It promises a stricter regulatory hand.

It has no clear policy.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What historical example was given to illustrate ethical questions in tech-government relationships?

Bill Gates joining the Clinton administration.

David Packer joining the Nixon administration.

Steve Jobs joining the Obama administration.

Elon Musk joining the Trump administration.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which tech leaders were mentioned as having significant influence over online communication and commerce?

Tim Cook and Larry Page

Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos

Sundar Pichai and Satya Nadella

Bill Gates and Steve Jobs

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key criticism of tech companies mentioned in the transcript?

They have too much power without enough regulation.

They are not innovative enough.

They focus too much on hardware.

They are too small to influence politics.