CLEAN : UK government disappointed by Brexit ruling

The transcript discusses a legal case involving the UK government's compliance with a court ruling. The court clarified that it was not deciding on Brexit itself, as that decision was already made by the public. The government must now act politically to implement Brexit. The speaker expresses shock at personal abuse received for raising legitimate legal questions.

What was the initial step taken by the respondents in the legal case?

• They appealed to the Supreme Court.

• They brought the case to the High Court.

• They filed a complaint with the European Union.

• They sought a public referendum.

How did the government respond to the court's decision?

• By complying with the judgment.

• By holding a public protest.

• By ignoring the ruling.

• By appealing to a higher court.

What was the court's stance on the UK's decision to leave the EU?

• The court decided the UK should leave.

• The court suggested a new referendum.

• The court decided the UK should stay.

• The court did not decide on the matter.

What does the court's decision provide for the government?

• A reason to delay Brexit.

• An opportunity to renegotiate with the EU.

• Legal foundations to trigger Article 50.

• A mandate to hold another referendum.

What personal experience did the speaker share regarding the case?

• Receiving widespread support.

• Facing personal abuse.

• Gaining political recognition.

• Being awarded a legal honor.