How China May Respond to Possible U.S. Trade Probe

How China May Respond to Possible U.S. Trade Probe

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the distinction between retaliation and trade war, focusing on US-China relations. It highlights China's strategic response to potential US actions, emphasizing the importance of not appearing weak. The Chinese economy is performing well, and the Trump presidency has not led to major economic shocks. Perspectives from investors and government officials in Asia suggest that the feared trade disruptions have not materialized.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main distinction made between retaliation and trade war in the context of the US investigation?

Retaliation is a form of trade war.

Trade war is a peaceful negotiation.

Retaliation and trade war are the same.

Retaliation does not necessarily lead to a trade war.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is it important for China to maintain a strong image during the committee meetings and Congress meeting?

To encourage foreign investments.

To increase tariffs.

To prevent looking weak.

To avoid economic growth.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How has the Trump presidency affected the Chinese government according to the transcript?

It has increased tariffs on Chinese goods.

It has caused economic decline.

It has been beneficial for China.

It has led to a trade war.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the initial concern of investors and officials in Asia regarding Trump's policies?

Reducing tariffs on Asian goods.

Dismantling the international trading system.

Increased cooperation with China.

Strengthening the US economy.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What has been the actual impact of the US on the international trading system according to the transcript?

It has caused a macroeconomic shock.

It has dismantled the trading system.

It has not been a source of macroeconomic shock.

It has improved international relations.