Twitter Thwarts Government Effort to Unmask Trump Critic

The transcript discusses Twitter's recent legal victory against a government data request, highlighting the company's stance on free speech and its willingness to challenge government demands. It contrasts this with Twitter's cooperation in criminal cases, where they provide information to authorities. The discussion also touches on the influence of Donald Trump on Twitter's agenda and the importance of maintaining the platform's independence and reputation.

What was the main reason the government withdrew its request for information from Twitter?

• The government found the information elsewhere.

• Twitter provided the information voluntarily.

• The government realized they had no strong case.

• The case was no longer relevant.

In what type of cases does Twitter cooperate with the government?

• Civil cases

• Criminal cases

• Political cases

• Financial cases

What action did Twitter take in response to a user sending an epilepsy-inducing tweet?

• They provided user information to the government.

• They ignored the incident.

• They issued a public apology.

• They banned the user.

How does Twitter handle government requests related to free speech matters?

• They evaluate each request individually.

• They negotiate terms with the government.

• They comply with all requests.

• They are steadfast in not providing information.

What is the significance of Twitter's stance on free speech for its platform?

• It helps them gain more users.

• It maintains their independence and reputation.

• It increases their advertising revenue.

• It allows them to avoid legal issues.