California Judge Blocks Trump Admin. Asylum Ban For The Second Time

U.S. District Judge John Tiger issued a nationwide injunction blocking President Trump's asylum ban, which aimed to deny asylum to those who traveled through another country without seeking asylum there first. Initially, the 9th Circuit Court limited the injunction to California and Arizona, but Judge Tiger later reinstated it nationwide to support organizations aiding asylum seekers. The decision faced criticism from officials like Mark Morgan, who labeled it as judicial activism.

What was the main reason for the nationwide injunction issued by Judge John Tiger?

• To enforce stricter immigration laws

• To increase the number of asylum seekers

• To block the plan limiting asylum seekers

• To support President Trump's asylum plan

What was the initial scope of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling on the injunction?

• Limited to California and Arizona

• Applicable to all border states

• Nationwide

• Only in Texas

Why did Judge Tiger reinstate the nationwide injunction?

• To support the Trump administration

• To provide relief to organizations aiding asylum seekers

• To increase border security

• To comply with a Supreme Court order

How did acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark Morgan describe the injunction?

• A necessary legal action

• A case of unprecedented judicial activism

• A supportive measure for asylum seekers

• A routine judicial procedure

What was the department's response to the injunction according to Mark Morgan?

• They agreed with the court's decision

• They intended to keep going

• They planned to appeal the decision

• They decided to halt all operations