3 Judges to Weigh Trump Travel Ban Appeal

The transcript discusses the judicial process regarding a case that may reach the Supreme Court. It highlights the seriousness with which judges are considering the case and the potential for it to escalate to the Supreme Court if the 9th Circuit rules against the Trump administration. The administration argues that Congress has given the President broad authority to exclude people from entering the country, and courts should not second-guess this authority. The discussion also touches on the broad nature of the order blocking the policy.

What does the judges' serious consideration of the request imply about the case?

• The decision requires careful thought.

• The decision will be made quickly.

• The judges are not interested.

• The case is straightforward.

What is the likelihood of the case reaching the Supreme Court?

• It will almost certainly reach the Supreme Court.

• The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction.

• It has already been decided by the Supreme Court.

• It is unlikely to reach the Supreme Court.

What might happen if the 9th Circuit rules against the administration?

• The case will be dropped.

• The administration will accept the decision.

• The case will be resolved immediately.

• The administration will appeal to the Supreme Court.

What is the main argument of the Trump administration regarding the ban?

• The courts should decide on national security.

• The ban is a temporary measure.

• The President has broad authority to exclude people.

• The ban is unnecessary.

According to the administration, what role do courts have in national security decisions?

• Courts should have a major role.

• Courts should have no role.

• Courts should only advise.

• Courts should enforce the ban.