William Marcus Wilson's Defense Team Wants Judge Disqualified

The video discusses the case of William Marcus Wilson, accused of murder in Georgia. Wilson claims self-defense, stating the truck he shot at tried to run him off the road and made racist remarks. Georgia's stand-your-ground law is central to his defense. The legal process has faced scrutiny, with concerns about judicial conduct and a motion to disqualify the judge. The defense argues for immunity from prosecution, while the prosecution disputes these claims.

What is the main argument of William Marcus Wilson's defense team?

• He was not present at the scene.

• He acted in self-defense.

• He was framed by the police.

• He has an alibi for the time of the incident.

Which law does Wilson's defense team cite to argue for his immunity from prosecution?

• The Stand Your Ground Law

• The Duty to Retreat Law

• The Castle Doctrine

• The Good Samaritan Law

What was the defense's concern regarding the judge in Wilson's case?

• The judge was biased against the defense.

• The judge had a conflict of interest.

• The judge was not qualified to preside over the case.

• The judge was related to the victim.

What did the defense allege about the treatment of witnesses?

• Witnesses were not allowed to testify.

• Witnesses were bribed by the prosecution.

• Witnesses were treated equally.

• Defense witnesses were treated differently than state witnesses.

What is the prosecution's stance on the defense's claims about the judge?

• They have no comment on the matter.

• They agree with the defense.

• They believe the claims are valid.

• They disagree and find no basis for recusal.