CLEAN : Dutch lawyer criticises Indonesian government over execution

The video discusses the international criticism Indonesia faced after executing individuals for drug offenses, highlighting the lack of alignment with international law. It questions the application of the death penalty to drug couriers, emphasizing the need for due process and transparency. The video contrasts Indonesia's practices with those in the United States, where executions are more transparent, involving legal and diplomatic representatives.

What was the main reason for the international criticism against Indonesia's executions?

• The lack of media coverage

• The method of execution used

• The application of the death penalty for drug offenses

• The involvement of foreign nationals

Why is the use of the death penalty for drug couriers controversial?

• It is a common practice worldwide

• They have access to good legal representation

• It is not aligned with international law

• They are considered the most dangerous criminals

What is emphasized as necessary before sentencing someone to death?

• A quick trial

• A government decree

• A public vote

• A fair legal process with independent representation

How does the United States' execution process differ from Indonesia's?

• It is conducted with full transparency

• It is faster

• It is more secretive

• It involves more government officials

What was the issue with the execution process in Indonesia as mentioned in the transcript?

• The executions were delayed

• No representatives were allowed to witness the executions

• The executions were broadcasted live

• The executions were held in a public place