VOICED : Environmental groups warn over toxic mud in Hungary

Environmental activists are raising concerns about a reservoir on the Danube's banks, containing 6 million tons of toxic sludge from alumina production. A Hungarian company is adding more waste under the guise of treatment, sparking controversy. The company claims compliance with regulations, using compost to cover the sludge. However, Greenpeace warns of ongoing risks, and EU legal compliance is under scrutiny.

What is the primary environmental concern associated with the reservoir on the Danube's banks?

• The increase in water levels.

• The construction of a new dam.

• The presence of invasive species.

• The presence of 6 million tons of toxic sludge.

How does the Hungarian company claim to manage the toxic sludge?

• By burning it to reduce volume.

• By covering it with compost made from industrial and household waste.

• By diluting it with water.

• By exporting it to another country.

What is the company's justification for their waste management practices?

• It purifies the water in the reservoir.

• It generates renewable energy.

• It reduces the overall volume of waste.

• It creates artificial soil beneficial for plant life.

What is the main concern of Greenpeace regarding the company's practices?

• The practices are not innovative enough.

• The practices are too expensive.

• The practices are not visible to the public.

• The practices may be illegal under EU law.

What is the current status of the debate in Brussels regarding Hungary's compliance with EU legislation?

• Hungary has been found compliant.

• Hungary has been fined.

• The case has been dismissed.

• A decision is still pending.