Clinton, Trump and the Politics of Global Trade

Clinton, Trump and the Politics of Global Trade

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the emotional nature of the election and the candidates' similar positions on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). It highlights the economic and political goals of TPP and the broader impact of trade agreements like NAFTA, emphasizing the winners and losers. The discussion points out the lack of inclusiveness in trade benefits and the ineffectiveness of trade adjustment assistance programs. The need for a comprehensive plan to support those affected by trade is underscored.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the common stance of both candidates on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)?

Only Trump supports it.

Only Clinton supports it.

They both support it.

They both oppose it.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key reason for the current trade situation according to the transcript?

Trade agreements were too inclusive.

The benefits of trade were evenly distributed.

The impact on domestic workers was underestimated.

Trade agreements were not economically beneficial.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main criticisms of trade adjustment assistance programs?

They are trivial in size and impact.

They effectively improve the situation for affected workers.

They are well-funded and successful.

They are too large in scale.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the loss of jobs in one sector affect the local economy?

It pushes down wages and affects ancillary businesses.

It increases wages for other workers.

It has no effect on other sectors.

It boosts local businesses.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the broader issue with the benefits of trade as discussed in the transcript?

They only benefit international companies.

They are too inclusive.

They are irrelevant to the local economy.

They are not inclusive enough.