Australia's IFM Still Sees 'Significant Opportunity' in U.S. Infrastructure

Australia's IFM Still Sees 'Significant Opportunity' in U.S. Infrastructure

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the US infrastructure plan, highlighting its economic and social imperatives, and the political challenges it faces. It emphasizes the role of case studies in demonstrating the benefits of pension fund investments in infrastructure. The asset recycling model from Australia is explained as a successful partnership between government and private sectors, which could be adapted in the US. The concept of a pension public partnership is introduced as a new form of P3, aiming to attract private capital. Lobbying efforts to promote this model have been positively received across political lines.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main challenge mentioned in the context of the $2 trillion plan?

Lack of investor interest

Political hurdles

Insufficient funds

Technological barriers

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a key feature of the asset recycling model used in Australia?

Partnership solely with the private sector

Sale of existing assets

Use of government funds only

Lease of existing assets

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How are the proceeds from asset leases used in the asset recycling model?

Used for government expenses

Invested in foreign markets

Distributed as dividends

Recycled into new infrastructure

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the new form of partnership proposed for the US?

Government-corporate partnership

Public-private partnership

Investor-state partnership

Pension public partnership

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What has been the general reception to the pension public partnership in the US?

Opposed by private investors

Indifferent due to lack of awareness

Positive with bipartisan support

Negative due to high costs