CLEAN : Military trial of Palestinian teen opens behind closed doors

The video discusses the legality of occupation and its impact on court trials, emphasizing the rights of minors in court settings. It argues that courts should prioritize the best interests of minors over their own interests. The video also highlights public interest in military court cases and the importance of transparency, suggesting that closing court doors infringes on rights and hides trials from public scrutiny.

What is the main argument the speaker plans to present at the preliminary hearings?

• The occupation is illegal.

• The occupation is legal.

• The court should not hold any hearings.

• The hearings should be postponed.

Who should decide whether the court doors are open or closed?

• The military

• The court itself

• The minor and her parents

• The public

What is the speaker's view on the court's decision-making process?

• The court should prioritize its own interests.

• The court should prioritize public opinion.

• The court should prioritize the military's interests.

• The court should prioritize the minor's interests.

Why are people outside the military court interested in the case?

• They believe the trial is fair.

• They are concerned about the minor's rights being infringed.

• They are interested in military procedures.

• They want to support the court's decision.

What is suggested as a method to keep the trial out of public view?

• Inviting the public to attend

• Publishing trial details

• Closing the court doors

• Broadcasting the trial