Wouldn’t Give ‘No-Deal’ Brexit a Zero Yet, Says Peterson Institute’s Kirkegaard

The transcript discusses the UK Parliament's legislative efforts to prevent a no deal Brexit and the complexities of extending Article 50, which requires EU approval. It highlights the limited options for Brexiteers, who must choose between supporting Theresa May's deal or facing a longer extension. The discussion also covers the evolving Brexit proposal by Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn, which leans towards a permanent customs union. The government's position on Brexit is rapidly changing, as indicated by the attorney general's comments on the BBC.

What is the main legislative action discussed in the first section regarding Brexit?

• A vote of no confidence in the Prime Minister

• A referendum on the final Brexit deal

• A new trade agreement with the EU

• Legislation to prevent a no-deal Brexit

What are the two main choices facing Brexiteers according to the second section?

• Support Theresa May's deal or face a longer extension

• Call for a second referendum or leave without a deal

• Form a coalition government or hold a general election

• Negotiate a new deal or remain in the EU

What is the new proposal mentioned in the second section that resembles Labour's Brexit plan?

• A second referendum

• A permanent customs union

• A no-deal Brexit

• A free trade agreement with the US

What does the Attorney General's comment suggest about the government's position on Brexit?

• The government is open to a customs union

• The government is considering a no-deal Brexit

• The government is seeking a trade deal with the US

• The government is planning a second referendum

Has Prime Minister Theresa May shown any significant change in her negotiating stance according to the final section?

• Yes, she has completely changed her stance

• No, she has resigned from her position

• No, there has been no significant change

• Yes, she has agreed to a second referendum