CLEAN : Catalan ex-leader Puigdemont regains MEP immunity

The transcript discusses a decision by the European judiciary that protects political rights by addressing the lifting of parliamentary immunity. It highlights the provisional nature of the decision and its importance in restoring immunity without infringing on parliamentary rights. The decision strengthens political rights and includes cultural and political reflections on its broader implications.

What is the nature of the European judiciary's decision regarding immunity?

• It is a provisional decision.

• It is an irrelevant decision.

• It is a permanent decision.

• It is a final decision.

Why is the decision of the European judiciary considered important?

• It sets a precedent for future decisions.

• It has no impact on political rights.

• It is a routine decision.

• It is the first decision of its kind.

What does the decision to restore immunity to some MPs signify?

• An infringement on Parliament's rights.

• A reduction in political rights.

• A permanent change in law.

• A temporary return of justice.

How does restoring immunity affect Parliament?

• It infringes on Parliament's rights.

• It has no effect on Parliament.

• It weakens Parliament.

• It strengthens Parliament.

What is emphasized by the restoration of immunity in terms of democracy?

• The need for more restrictions.

• The importance of justice in democracy.

• The irrelevance of justice.

• The weakening of political rights.