U.S. Tariffs on $360 Billion of Chinese Goods Remain At Least Until Elections

U.S. Tariffs on $360 Billion of Chinese Goods Remain At Least Until Elections

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the ongoing tariffs on $360 billion of Chinese goods, which are expected to remain for another ten months. The Trump administration uses this as a strategy to enforce agreements and campaign on being tough on China. However, this approach risks pressuring the US and global economies. The video highlights the temporary nature of the truce, with commitments on currency and intellectual property but no significant rollbacks on industrial policies. The US, EU, and Japan are working on a multilateral agreement to address industrial subsidies, potentially updating global trade rules. China's state media has responded positively to the negotiations, emphasizing peaceful coexistence.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main reason the Trump administration is keeping tariffs on $360 billion of Chinese goods?

To reduce the US trade deficit

To enforce a trade agreement

To support Chinese industrial policies

To increase US exports

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the nature of the current trade agreement between the US and China?

A permanent resolution

A temporary truce

A complete rollback of tariffs

An escalation of trade tensions

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which issue remains a sticking point in US-China trade negotiations?

Currency manipulation

Tariff reductions

Intellectual property

Industrial subsidies

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which countries are involved in the multilateral efforts to address China's industrial subsidies?

EU, Japan, and Australia

US, China, and India

China, India, and Brazil

US, EU, and Japan

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How has China responded to being removed from the currency manipulator label?

By withdrawing from negotiations

With positive rhetoric

By escalating trade tensions

With increased tariffs