Report Highlights How Wealthy Use Offshore Companies: ICIJ

Report Highlights How Wealthy Use Offshore Companies: ICIJ

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses a new leak involving offshore finance, revealing how 14 service providers worldwide facilitate the use of shell companies by over 300 politicians, including global leaders. While not always illegal, these practices raise ethical concerns and highlight the need for transparency reforms. The investigation aims to spark discussions on wealth hoarding and its impact on nations, with some countries already promising further investigations.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What distinguishes this leak from the Panama Papers?

It was released a decade ago.

It involves only one service provider.

It includes information from 14 different service providers.

It focuses solely on European politicians.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a common use of shell companies by politicians as mentioned in the video?

To hold assets or buy real estate in secrecy jurisdictions.

To support local businesses.

To evade international sanctions.

To promote transparency in their countries.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do the financial services mentioned in the video operate within legal boundaries?

They strictly adhere to all legal requirements.

They often push the limitations of what is legal.

They operate without any legal oversight.

They are fully transparent with their operations.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which country and its states have become significant players in attracting individuals accused of wrongdoing?

United Kingdom

Switzerland

United States

Singapore

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the expected outcome of the investigation according to the video?

Complete eradication of offshore finance.

Increased public scrutiny and potential reforms.

No significant changes or outcomes.

Immediate legal action against all involved.