CLEAN: British court approves eviction of Occupy London protesters

The transcript discusses the importance of supporting change and the legal expectations surrounding a case involving the City of London and the Highways Act. It highlights the negative impact of corporations leaving properties vacant for land banking, emphasizing the moral imperative to utilize empty buildings. The transcript concludes with reflections and questions about societal responsibilities.

What was the legal basis that the City of London used in their case?

• Corporate Law

• Environmental Protection Act

• Highways Act

• Property Act

What was the speaker's stance on the outcome of the legal case?

• They were indifferent to the outcome.

• They were certain of losing.

• They were confident of winning.

• They hoped for a better outcome.

Why do corporations leave properties vacant, according to the speaker?

• To avoid taxes

• To reduce maintenance costs

• To land bank and borrow cheaply

• To increase property value

What is the moral imperative mentioned regarding empty buildings?

• To sell them at a profit

• To demolish them

• To renovate them

• To use them

What does the speaker encourage individuals to do in the final section?

• Ignore the issue

• Support corporate interests

• Reflect on the moral responsibilities

• Invest in vacant properties