CLEAN : Kerry warns China Russia over Snowden

CLEAN : Kerry warns China Russia over Snowden

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Journalism

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses diplomatic relations, focusing on legal standards and implications of violating them. It highlights the importance of reciprocity in law enforcement, referencing a surrender treaty with Hong Kong and the transfer of prisoners to Russia. The discussion also touches on Edward Snowden's choice of China and Russia, questioning their stance on Internet freedom.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the significance of diplomatic exchanges according to the speaker?

They help in strengthening international relationships.

They are only for political gain.

They are a form of entertainment.

They are a waste of resources.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker suggest about countries that do not adhere to legal standards?

They set a good example for others.

They encourage other countries to break the law.

They have no impact on global relations.

They are likely to receive more international support.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the potential consequence of allowing someone to board an airplane without proper notice?

It is a common practice.

It strengthens international ties.

It has no effect on relationships.

It could negatively impact international relations.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might Mr. Snowden have chosen China and Russia for refuge?

They are known for their internet freedom.

They have strict internet regulations.

They offer no protection for whistleblowers.

They are close allies of the United States.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the speaker imply about reciprocity in law enforcement?

It is a new concept in diplomacy.

It only benefits powerful countries.

It is crucial for maintaining legal standards.

It is irrelevant in international law.