Trump Threatens Litigation Over 2016 Election Probes

The transcript discusses the investigation into alleged corruption during the 2016 election, focusing on the impact of false collusion charges against Donald Trump. It highlights the extensive resources spent on the investigation and the lack of evidence found. The speaker criticizes the use of subpoenas by political figures like Nancy Pelosi and contrasts it with Paul Ryan's approach, emphasizing the need to prevent such situations from recurring in the future.

What was the speaker's main claim about the investigation into the 2016 election?

• It was a thorough and justified investigation.

• It was a baseless investigation with no evidence found.

• It was a minor investigation with little impact.

• It was a successful investigation with many convictions.

What does the speaker suggest should never happen again to a president?

• A peaceful transition of power.

• A baseless investigation like the one in 2016.

• A successful election campaign.

• A bipartisan agreement in Congress.

How did the investigation affect individuals who came to Washington?

• They were promoted and celebrated.

• They were unaffected and continued their work.

• They were given awards for their service.

• They were negatively impacted and served with subpoenas.

What is the speaker's view on Nancy Pelosi's handling of subpoenas?

• She never issues subpoenas under any circumstances.

• She issues subpoenas freely, like handing out cookies.

• She only issues subpoenas after thorough investigation.

• She is very cautious and rarely issues them.

How does the speaker describe Paul Ryan's approach to issuing subpoenas?

• He issues them freely without much thought.

• He issues subpoenas only to his political allies.

• He is very cautious and prefers to discuss before issuing.

• He never issues subpoenas under any circumstances.