CLEAN : Denmark backs deal to keep Britain in the EU

The transcript discusses the need for an agreement, highlighting a proposal that addresses key issues without requiring amendments. It emphasizes the importance of legally binding deals, referencing the Danish model from 1992 as a precedent. The speaker mentions Britain's unresolved issues within the EU and draws parallels to Denmark's successful negotiations. Recent meetings in Poland are noted as positive steps towards a strong deal, with a commitment to taking the necessary time to finalize it for Britain's benefit.

What is the speaker's perspective on the proposed paper?

• It needs significant amendments.

• It is irrelevant to the discussion.

• It is a solid answer to their needs.

• It should be discarded.

What does the speaker propose regarding child benefits?

• To decrease them for children in the UK.

• To eliminate them entirely.

• To increase them for all children.

• To index them for children living in other Member States.

Which historical model does the speaker reference as a precedent for a legally binding deal?

• The Danish model of 1992.

• The German model of 2000.

• The Italian model of 1995.

• The French model of 1985.

What comparison does the speaker make regarding Britain's current issues with the EU?

• They compare it to Denmark's successful negotiation in Edinburgh.

• They compare it to Spain's issues in 2005.

• They compare it to France's issues in 1990.

• They compare it to Italy's negotiation in 1980.

What is the speaker's outlook on the meetings held in Poland?

• They were inconclusive.

• They were very positive and helpful.

• They were irrelevant to the deal.

• They were unproductive.