CLEAN : Expert weighs in on deaths among AstraZeneca jab recipients

The video discusses the initial skepticism about the association between the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine and adverse events, which was thought to be random. However, evidence from different populations suggests a causal link, though the risk remains low at one per million. The risk of severe COVID-19 is higher, emphasizing the vaccine's benefits. The speaker calls for transparency from regulatory bodies to maintain public trust and suggests identifying subgroups at higher risk. The video concludes by stating that while no vaccine is risk-free, the benefits outweigh the negligible risks.

What was the initial belief about the association between the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine and adverse events?

• It was thought to be a widespread issue.

• It was immediately accepted as a causal link.

• It was believed to be a random association without causation.

• It was considered a significant risk.

How does the risk of adverse events from the vaccine compare to the risk of dying from COVID-19?

• Neither poses any risk.

• Both risks are equal.

• The risk from COVID-19 is higher.

• The risk from the vaccine is higher.

What is suggested to reassure people about the vaccine's safety?

• Increasing the vaccine dosage.

• Ignoring the adverse events.

• Complete withdrawal of the vaccine.

• More transparency from medical authorities.

What could undermine trust in the vaccine program?

• Offering multiple vaccine options.

• Providing too much information.

• Not vaccinating anyone under a certain age.

• Vaccinating everyone without restrictions.

What is generally considered an acceptable risk level for adverse events in medical treatments?

• One in a hundred.

• One in a thousand.

• One in a million.

• One in ten million.