Supreme Court Sides With Coach Who Sought To Pray After Game

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a high school football coach's right to pray on the field after games, citing First Amendment rights. The decision was a 6-3 split, with conservative justices supporting the coach. The court emphasized that the school district's actions were discriminatory against religious observance. This ruling is part of a trend towards a pro-religion stance by the current court.

What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the high school football coach's right to pray on the field?

• The court ruled against the coach.

• The court ruled in favor of the coach.

• The court did not make a decision.

• The court postponed the decision.

What was the main reason the court supported the coach's right to pray?

• The coach's actions were protected by the First Amendment.

• The coach was forcing students to join him.

• The coach was violating the Establishment Clause.

• The coach was acting as a government employee.

How did the court view the school district's actions against the coach?

• As a correct interpretation of the law.

• As a mistaken view of suppressing religious observance.

• As an example of proper school policy.

• As a necessary measure to maintain discipline.

What does the ruling indicate about the current Supreme Court's stance?

• The court is neutral on religious matters.

• The court is against religious rights.

• The court is pro-religion.

• The court is undecided on religious issues.

How did the justices vote in this case?

• Unanimously in favor of the coach.

• Six to three in favor of the coach.

• Six to three against the coach.

• Unanimously against the coach.