Interview with Russian Ambassador to the UK Andrei Kelin

The video discusses Russia's negotiation strategy with the US and NATO, highlighting the presentation of draft treaties and the perception of an ultimatum. It delves into the historical context of agreements since 1997, focusing on the US's withdrawal from various treaties. The Russian position emphasizes the instability of US administrations and the need for legally binding guarantees from NATO. The discussion concludes with the importance of diplomatic relations and the necessity for guarantees to ensure peaceful coexistence.

What approach has Russia taken in its recent negotiations with the US and NATO?

• Russia has focused solely on economic agreements.

• Russia presented draft treaties as if negotiations had already concluded.

• Russia has refused to engage in any talks.

• Russia has been open to extensive negotiations.

What historical context is provided for Russia's stance on NATO expansion?

• NATO expansion discussions began in the early 2000s.

• NATO has always been open to Russian membership.

• Russia has been concerned about NATO expansion since 1997.

• NATO expansion was never a concern for Russia.

Which agreements have the US allegedly abandoned, according to the transcript?

• The Geneva Convention, START Treaty, and NAFTA.

• The Kyoto Protocol, NAFTA, and TPP.

• The Paris Agreement, TPP, and Kyoto Protocol.

• The Paris Agreement, INF Treaty, and Iran Deal.

Why does Russia demand legally binding guarantees from NATO?

• To ensure economic cooperation.

• To promote tourism between member states.

• To prevent the deployment of striking weapons near its borders.

• To facilitate cultural exchanges.

What is a key reason for Russia's distrust towards the United States?

• The US has stable and unchanging administrations.

• The US has never engaged in any treaties with Russia.

• The US has consistently supported Russia's policies.

• The US frequently changes its stance on international treaties due to changing administrations.