Wrapup: Final Day Of Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Hearings

The transcript discusses the confirmation process of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. It outlines the timeline for her confirmation, including a committee vote on October 22nd and potential seating by Election Day. Democrats express strong opposition, warning Republicans about future credibility issues. Republicans justify their actions by citing historical precedent when the President and Senate are of the same party. The transcript concludes with final arguments and the voting process, noting the impact of COVID-19 and dissent from some GOP senators.

What is the significance of October 22nd in the context of Judge Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation?

• It is the date when Barrett could be seated on the bench.

• It is the date when Barrett was nominated by the President.

• It is the date of the final Senate vote.

• It is the date of the committee vote to advance her confirmation.

What warning did Democrats give to Republicans regarding Barrett's confirmation?

• That Barrett was not qualified for the position.

• That the confirmation would be overturned.

• That the process was unconstitutional.

• That they would lose credibility in future nominations.

How did Republicans justify their decision to proceed with Barrett's nomination?

• By arguing that the Supreme Court needed to be fully staffed.

• By stating that the President and Senate are of the same party.

• By claiming Barrett was the only qualified candidate.

• By saying the nomination process was already delayed.

What was a significant concern raised during the closing arguments on Barrett's nomination?

• The potential loss of faith in the Supreme Court.

• The impact on the upcoming election.

• The absence of a clear judicial philosophy.

• The lack of bipartisan support.

What challenge did the Republicans face during the nomination process?

• Three members testing positive for COVID-19.

• A public protest against the nomination.

• A legal challenge from the opposition.

• A lack of majority support in the Senate.