Trump Clears Officers Accused Of War Crimes, Ignoring Pentagon Advice

The transcript discusses President Trump's decision to grant full pardons to two army officers, Clint Lawrence and Matthew Goldstein, and restore the rank of Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher. These actions were taken despite the Pentagon's recommendation against it, as it could undermine military judicial integrity. The New York Times reports that conservative figures view these men as war heroes, unfairly prosecuted for actions during battle. Defense Secretary Mark Esper expressed confidence in the military justice system's legitimacy.

What was the Pentagon's stance on the presidential pardons for the army officers?

• They supported the pardons.

• They recommended against the pardons.

• They had no opinion.

• They recommended the pardons.

What was the reason for Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher's demotion?

• He disobeyed direct orders.

• He posed with a dead ISIS prisoner.

• He was found guilty of theft.

• He leaked classified information.

How do conservative lawmakers and commentators view the pardoned men?

• As neutral figures in the military.

• As individuals who should be ignored.

• As war heroes unfairly prosecuted.

• As criminals who should be punished.

What concern did the Defense Department express about the presidential intervention?

• It could improve military morale.

• It might undermine military judicial integrity.

• It could lead to more pardons.

• It would increase military spending.

What was Defense Secretary Mark Esper's view on the military justice system?

• He was confident in its legitimacy.

• He believed it was flawed.

• He thought it needed reform.

• He had no opinion on it.