The Tech Behind Waymo's Uber Lawsuit

Waymo, formerly Google's self-driving unit, investigated a potential theft of Lidar technology by Otto, a company founded by former Google employee Anthony Levandowski. This led to a lawsuit, highlighting a shift in Google's approach to former employees. The case reflects the competitive landscape in autonomous vehicles, with companies like Tesla and Uber emerging as rivals. Uber's acquisition of Otto surprised its own autonomous unit, revealing internal tensions.

What was the primary concern for Waymo that led to their investigation?

• The development of similar Lidar technology

• A new competitor in the market

• A change in leadership

• A decline in their market share

What was unusual about Google's lawsuit against Anthony Levandowski?

• It was a collaboration with other tech companies

• It was the first time Google sued a former employee

• It was a public relations strategy

• It was a common practice for Google

How did Anthony Levandowski's role at Google reflect the company's culture at the time?

• He was encouraged to innovate independently

• He was not allowed to work with other companies

• He was discouraged from starting side projects

• He was strictly monitored by Google

Which companies are mentioned as competitors in the autonomous vehicle industry?

• Amazon and Facebook

• Tesla and General Motors

• IBM and Intel

• Apple and Microsoft

What was the reaction within Uber to the acquisition of Otto?

• It was immediately rejected

• It was met with enthusiasm

• It was a complete surprise

• It was a well-known plan