Gail Bradbrook Interview Part 1

The transcript discusses the role of civil disobedience in achieving social change, emphasizing that historically, breaking the law has been necessary to bring about significant reforms. The speaker argues against the notion that lawbreaking undermines future laws, citing examples like the Chartists and suffragettes. The debate centers on whether breaking the law is justified to address urgent issues like climate change.

What is the primary reason the speaker gives for their movement not being classified as organized crime?

• They have political support.

• They operate in secret.

• They are a peaceful, nonviolent movement.

• They have a large number of followers.

According to the speaker, why is civil disobedience necessary for change?

• History shows it is necessary for change.

• It is a form of entertainment.

• It attracts media attention.

• It is a way to avoid punishment.

Which historical example does the speaker use to justify breaking the law for social progress?

• The Chartists' movement

• The American Revolution

• The Industrial Revolution

• The Renaissance

What is the speaker's response to the argument that breaking the law undermines future legal compliance?

• Laws should be followed at all costs.

• Legal compliance is irrelevant.

• Breaking the law is never justified.

• Sometimes laws must be broken to create new ones.

Who does the speaker reference to support the idea of breaking laws to enact change?

• Martin Luther King Jr.

• Emmeline Pankhurst

• Nelson Mandela

• Mahatma Gandhi