UK Supreme Court has overturned a block on a third runway at Heathrow

The Supreme Court's decision to halt Heathrow's third runway plans due to environmental concerns under the Paris Agreement has sparked frustration among activists. The ruling raises doubts about the future of the expansion, which supporters argue is crucial for economic recovery post-COVID. Local residents oppose the runway due to noise and climate impact, while political figures face pressure to address the issue. The government-owned Climate Committee suggests that a third runway would necessitate cuts at other airports, complicating the situation further.

What was the main reason for the Supreme Court's decision regarding Heathrow's third runway?

• The need for more airport capacity

• The support from local residents

• The government's commitment to the Paris climate Agreement

• The economic benefits of the expansion

How do supporters of the third runway justify its construction?

• It will create jobs and boost the economy

• It will reduce air traffic congestion

• It will enhance local infrastructure

• It will improve international relations

What is a major concern of local residents regarding the third runway?

• Higher travel costs

• Limited access to the airport

• Reduced flight options

• Increased noise pollution

What political stance did Boris Johnson take on the third runway?

• He advocated for more runways

• He supported the expansion for economic growth

• He promised to stop the construction

• He remained neutral on the issue

What does the government-owned Climate Committee suggest about the third runway?

• It will have no impact on other airports

• It will require cuts at other airports

• It will be beneficial for the environment

• It will increase tourism