CLEAN : Brexit: Reax after Scottish Judge rules Johnson's suspension of UK parliament lawful

The transcript discusses a legal case concerning the suspension of Parliament. It highlights the potential for executive overreach if the Prime Minister can suspend Parliament for extended periods without judicial intervention. The discussion includes the implications of such power, the current legal proceedings, and the appeal process. Despite a disappointing result, important information has been recorded, which is seen as valuable.

What is the significance of the inner house in the legal proceedings discussed?

• It is where the final decision is made.

• It is considered the starting point for significant actions.

• It is a place for informal discussions.

• It is where the appeal is filed.

What concern is raised about the Prime Minister's ability to suspend Parliament?

• It could treat Parliament as a minor inconvenience to executive power.

• It might result in a loss of public support.

• It might allow the Prime Minister to bypass the courts.

• It could lead to a permanent closure of Parliament.

Why is the power to suspend Parliament for an indeterminate period problematic?

• It could lead to a constitutional crisis.

• It might cause international disputes.

• It could undermine the judiciary's authority.

• It might result in financial instability.

What is the reaction to the result of the day's proceedings?

• There is a sense of victory and satisfaction.

• There is disappointment but a decision to appeal.

• There is a call for immediate action.

• There is confusion and uncertainty.

What is considered valuable despite the outcome of the case?

• The financial compensation received.

• The public support gained.

• The important information that has been recorded.

• The media coverage of the case.