Supreme Court Mirrors U.S. Divide on Trump Travel Ban

The transcript discusses a Supreme Court decision, comparing it to the Korematsu case. Chief Justice Roberts and other conservatives upheld the President's broad discretion in immigration matters, citing national security. Cass Sunstein's analysis and the dissenting opinions of Justices Breyer and Sotomayor are highlighted, focusing on the practicalities and operational implications of the decision. The discussion also touches on the potential for future changes and the historical context of similar landmark cases.

What historical case did Chief Justice Roberts repudiate in his opinion?

• Brown v. Board of Education

• Roe v. Wade

• Korematsu v. United States

• Plessy v. Ferguson

Which Justice focused on the practicalities of case-by-case waivers in their dissent?

• Justice Breyer

• Justice Sotomayor

• Justice Roberts

• Justice Kagan

What was a major concern of Justice Breyer regarding the immigration system?

• Inadequate guidance for consular officers

• High processing fees

• Lack of legal representation

• Excessive paperwork

What is the main operational implication of the court's decision?

• Increased judicial oversight

• Broad discretion for the administration

• Mandatory case-by-case reviews

• Reduced presidential powers

Which Justices are known for seeking compromise on the court?

• Justices Roberts and Kennedy

• Justices Alito and Thomas

• Justices Breyer and Kagan

• Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg