Martin Shkreli Faces Day of Reckoning in Court

The transcript discusses Martin Shkreli's legal troubles, focusing on his interactions with the FBI, his interview without a lawyer, and the implications of his social media activity. Shkreli is accused of defrauding investors by misusing funds. His defense may argue that his actions were legitimate business practices. The case is complicated by Shkreli's public persona and past actions, which have attracted negative attention and potential witnesses against him.

What was Martin Shkreli's mistake during his initial interaction with the FBI?

• He refused to speak to them.

• He provided them with evidence while trying to defend himself.

• He hired a lawyer to represent him.

• He admitted to insider trading.

How did Martin Shkreli's tweets affect his legal situation?

• They helped him gain public support.

• They were used as evidence against him.

• They led to a reduction in charges.

• They were ignored by the prosecution.

What role did an employee play in the prosecution's case against Shkreli?

• The employee defended Shkreli in court.

• The employee provided evidence against Shkreli.

• The employee was unaware of the situation.

• The employee was a co-defendant.

What is one defense strategy Shkreli's lawyers might use?

• Claiming he was unaware of the law.

• Denying all charges without evidence.

• Blaming the prosecution for bias.

• Arguing he was managing businesses legally.

What challenge does the defense face in predicting the outcome of Shkreli's case?

• Lack of legal precedents for similar cases.

• Overwhelming public support for Shkreli.

• Inability to find witnesses.

• Shkreli's refusal to cooperate.