Trump Says He Accepts Intelligence Conclusion on Russian Meddling

The speaker addresses the issue of Russian interference in the 2016 election, clarifying that while there was no impact on the election outcome, interference did occur. A misstatement in previous remarks is corrected, emphasizing that the speaker meant to say there was no reason it wouldn't be Russia. The speaker reaffirms the administration's commitment to preventing future election interference, particularly in 2018, and highlights efforts to repel such actions.

What was the speaker's stance on the impact of Russian actions on the election outcome?

• They had no impact at all.

• They had a significant impact.

• They were beneficial.

• They were inconclusive.

How did the speaker describe the House's stance on the issue of collusion?

• Unaware of the issue.

• Strongly against the idea of collusion.

• Supportive of collusion.

• Indifferent.

What did the speaker clarify about their previous statement?

• They meant to say 'would' instead of 'wouldn't'.

• They meant to say 'wouldn't' instead of 'would'.

• They meant to say 'could' instead of 'couldn't'.

• They meant to say 'should' instead of 'shouldn't'.

What is the speaker's administration doing to prevent election interference?

• Leaving it to the next administration.

• Taking aggressive actions to stop it.

• Encouraging interference.

• Ignoring the issue.

What year is the speaker particularly focused on preventing interference in?

• 2016

• 2017

• 2018

• 2019