US Will Send Cluster Munitions to Ukraine

The transcript discusses the complexities of using cluster munitions, weighing the risks of civilian harm against the need for Ukraine to have sufficient artillery ammunition. It highlights the consultation with allies, including those who are signatories to the Oslo Convention, and their varied reactions. The decision is framed as a necessary measure for Ukraine's defense, distinguishing it from Russia's use of such munitions. The discussion concludes with an emphasis on maintaining unity ahead of the NATO summit in Vilnius.

What is a significant risk associated with cluster munitions?

• They are expensive to produce.

• They are ineffective in combat.

• They can cause unexploded ordnance.

• They are difficult to transport.

Why was there initial hesitation to provide cluster munitions?

• Due to high production costs.

• Because of potential civilian harm.

• Because they are banned worldwide.

• Due to lack of military effectiveness.

How did non-signatories of the Oslo Convention react to the decision?

• They opposed it strongly.

• They were unaware of the decision.

• They were indifferent.

• They embraced it with open arms.

What is the main difference highlighted between Russia and Ukraine's use of cluster munitions?

• Russia uses them for attack, Ukraine for defense.

• Both use them for defense.

• Both use them for attack.

• Russia uses them for defense, Ukraine for attack.

What is the expected impact of the decision on NATO unity?

• It will have no impact on NATO unity.

• It will disrupt NATO unity.

• It will cause NATO to split.

• It will strengthen NATO unity.