FBI's Comey 'Deviated' From Procedures in Clinton Probe, Watchdog Finds

The transcript discusses a report on deviations from FBI and Justice Department procedures in handling the Hillary Clinton probe. It highlights the Inspector General's findings, noting no political bias but criticizing James Comey's actions, including his press conference and communication lapses with the Attorney General. The report's political implications are considered, particularly how it might be used by President Trump to undermine Comey's credibility and the Russia investigation. The analysis concludes that Comey's actions were irregular but not illegal.

What did the Inspector General's report conclude about James Comey's handling of the Clinton email investigation?

• He was charged with a crime.

• He deviated from procedures but showed no political bias.

• He showed political bias.

• He followed all procedures correctly.

What was unusual about Comey's press conference in July 2016?

• He was praised for his transparency.

• He did not inform the Attorney General about his statements.

• He followed all DOJ procedures.

• He notified the Attorney General in advance.

How might President Trump use the findings of the Inspector General's report?

• To undermine Comey's credibility and the Russia investigation.

• To support Comey's credibility.

• To initiate a new investigation into Clinton.

• To charge Comey with a crime.

What was confirmed about Comey's actions during the investigation?

• They were legally binding.

• They were irregular and against DOJ norms.

• They were in line with DOJ norms.

• They were politically motivated.

What is a key takeaway from the report regarding DOJ procedures?

• DOJ procedures were strictly followed.

• DOJ procedures allow public statements before elections.

• DOJ procedures were changed after the report.

• DOJ procedures were ignored by Comey.