CLEAN : Bangladesh compensation good first

The transcript discusses the responsibility of companies in a disaster, highlighting their negligence and the need for accountability. It calls for brands to offer compensation and take preventive measures to avoid future tragedies. The impact of public relations and the importance of maintaining public awareness are emphasized. The transcript also stresses the need to prevent similar tragedies and assigns blame to responsible parties. Finally, it outlines plans for campaigns to ensure justice for victims and prevent recurrence.

What is the primary reason companies are being held accountable for the disaster?

• Their quick response to the incident

• Their proactive safety measures

• Their negligence and failure to prevent the tragedy

• Their financial contributions to the victims

Why did companies like Primark respond quickly to the disaster?

• To support local businesses

• To avoid PR damage

• To launch a new product line

• To increase their market share

What is the significance of keeping the disaster in the public eye?

• To promote new fashion trends

• To encourage more factory openings

• To ensure justice for the victims and prevent future incidents

• To boost sales of the brands involved

What makes this tragedy different from other factory incidents?

• It occurred in a different country

• It involved only one brand

• It was preventable and on a much greater scale

• It was the first of its kind

What is the intended outcome of the campaigns mentioned in the last section?

• To increase brand loyalty

• To promote new fashion lines

• To reduce production costs

• To ensure justice and prevent future tragedies