UK's Health Secretary Sajid Javid interview on Boris Johnson and corruption over Downing Street Flat redecoration

The transcript discusses allegations against the Prime Minister regarding offering access for cash, which is labeled as corruption. Lord Guide's report is highlighted, stating no conflict of interest was found and the ministerial code was adhered to. The WhatsApp messages, initially unavailable to the Cabinet officer, were later reviewed by Lord Guide, who accepted the reasons for their unavailability. The Prime Minister's position remains unchanged, with no issues found in terms of the ministerial code or conflict of interest.

What was the main finding of Lord Guide's report regarding the Prime Minister's alleged actions?

• The ministerial code was breached.

• There was a conflict of interest.

• No conflict of interest was found.

• The Prime Minister resigned.

Why were certain messages not available to the Cabinet officer initially?

• The reasons were explained and accepted by Lord Geitz.

• They were encrypted.

• They were deleted.

• They were irrelevant to the case.

What role does Lord Guide play in reviewing the Prime Minister's case?

• He is a political advisor.

• He is a member of the Cabinet.

• He is the Prime Minister's assistant.

• He has an independent role to review such issues.

What was the public's reaction to the newly revealed messages?

• They saw the Prime Minister's position in a different light.

• They ignored the messages.

• They supported the Prime Minister.

• They demanded a new report.

What did Lord Guide conclude about the ministerial code in light of the new messages?

• The code was violated.

• There were no issues with the code.

• The code needed revision.

• The code was outdated.