U.K.'s Top Court To Hand Down Decision On Parliament Suspension

Boris Johnson's decision to suspend Parliament has been challenged as unlawful, with the Supreme Court set to rule on its legality. The suspension, occurring just before the UK's planned exit from the EU, is seen by critics as a tactic to silence opposition to Johnson's Brexit strategy. The court must decide if it has the authority to intervene and whether the suspension was legal. If deemed unlawful, Johnson may have to recall Parliament, though the government could attempt another suspension.

What was the main reason Boris Johnson's decision to suspend Parliament was considered controversial?

• It was announced too late.

• It was done without consulting the public.

• It was perceived as an attempt to silence opposition to his Brexit plan.

• It was seen as a routine procedure.

When did Boris Johnson decide to suspend Parliament?

• September 9th

• October 14th

• November 1st

• August 31st

What justification did Johnson provide for suspending Parliament?

• To negotiate with the EU

• To prepare for a new parliamentary session

• To avoid a no-deal Brexit

• To conduct a public referendum

What are the two main questions the Supreme Court needs to address regarding the suspension?

• If the Queen was misled and if the suspension was routine

• If the court has authority to intervene and if the suspension was legal

• Whether the suspension was too long and if it was necessary

• Whether the public supports the suspension and if it affects Brexit

What could happen if the Supreme Court finds Johnson's actions unlawful?

• Johnson could be removed from office.

• The decision would have no consequences.

• Parliament could be dissolved permanently.

• The court could order Parliament to be recalled.