Alaska's Supreme Court Hears Arguments Over Fossil Fuel Laws

A group of young Alaskans sued the state, claiming its focus on fossil fuel development harms their future. The case was dismissed in 2017, but they are appealing. The state argues climate issues should be handled by legislators, while the plaintiffs believe it's a court matter. The lawsuit claims Alaska's climate is a public trust resource, which the government must protect. A decision is expected in several months.

What is the main reason the young Alaskans filed a lawsuit against the state?

• To gain financial compensation from the state

• To stop all fossil fuel development

• To promote renewable energy sources

• To address the impact of fossil fuel development on their lives and futures

What was the outcome of the initial court ruling regarding the lawsuit?

• The lawsuit was settled out of court

• The lawsuit was postponed

• The lawsuit was dismissed

• The lawsuit was upheld

Who argued that climate change issues should be addressed by legislators, not the court?

• Alaska's assistant Attorney General

• The plaintiffs

• Environmental activists

• The judge

What legal principle is cited in the lawsuit regarding the state's responsibility to protect the climate?

• Environmental Protection Act

• Public Trust Doctrine

• Climate Change Act

• Natural Resources Law

What is the expected timeline for a decision on the appeal?

• A year

• Several months

• A few weeks

• Immediate decision