Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay comments on No Deal Brexit during visit to Quinn Cement...

The transcript discusses the potential outcomes and implications of a no deal scenario if Parliament fails to approve a deal. It emphasizes the importance of respecting democratic decisions and the need for thorough preparations to mitigate disruptions. The speaker highlights the challenges faced in preparing for a no deal, including the role of businesses and other Member States, and the uncertainty surrounding the EU's decision on granting an extension.

What does the speaker believe would be the impact of revoking the biggest democratic decision in history?

• It would be fundamentally wrong and disastrous.

• It would lead to economic growth.

• It would have no significant impact.

• It would strengthen international relations.

Why does the speaker argue against a second referendum?

• It would resolve the issue quickly.

• It would lead to a decisive outcome.

• It would prolong division for another 12 months.

• It would be supported by all Parliamentarians.

According to the speaker, what is necessary if Parliament does not agree on a deal?

• To hold a second referendum.

• To bring forward preparations for a no deal.

• To delay the decision indefinitely.

• To ignore the democratic decision.

What is one of the challenges mentioned in preparing for a no deal scenario?

• Insufficient government funding.

• Lack of interest from businesses.

• Support from all Member States.

• Parliament's decision to take no deal off the table.

What does the speaker suggest about the EU's role in granting an extension?

• There is no guarantee the EU will grant an extension.

• The decision is solely up to the UK.

• The EU is guaranteed to grant an extension.

• The EU has no say in the matter.