Title 42 Will Remain In Effect For The Foreseeable Future

The Supreme Court has allowed the Biden administration to end the Remain in Mexico policy, which required asylum seekers to wait in Mexico. Critics have long deemed the policy inhumane. Despite this, Title 42, another restrictive immigration policy, remains in effect, allowing swift expulsion of migrants due to pandemic concerns. Legal challenges from states like Texas and Missouri have kept these policies in place. Migrants face harsh conditions and confusion due to these policies, leading to tragic incidents like the San Antonio smuggling case.

What was the Supreme Court's reasoning for allowing the Biden administration to end the Remain in Mexico policy?

• The president should have the authority to implement his own foreign and immigration policy.

• The policy was deemed unconstitutional.

• The policy was too costly to maintain.

• The policy had already expired.

What is the primary function of Title 42 in the context of US immigration policy?

• To provide legal assistance to asylum seekers.

• To allow migrants to apply for asylum at US ports of entry.

• To swiftly expel most migrants without screening their asylum claims.

• To increase the number of migrants allowed into the US.

Why has Title 42 remained in effect despite efforts to repeal it?

• It was extended by the Supreme Court.

• It was renewed by the Biden administration.

• It was deemed necessary for national security.

• A federal judge kept it alive after republican states sued.

What challenges do migrants face due to the ever-changing border policies?

• Consistent and predictable outcomes.

• Increased access to legal representation.

• Difficulty in keeping up with the policies.

• Easier access to asylum.

What tragic event is highlighted as a consequence of the current immigration policies?

• A significant decrease in asylum applications.

• The death of over 50 migrants in a smuggling incident.

• The closure of all US ports of entry.

• A large protest at the border.