Brexit Plaintiff Miller Says Court Remains an Option

The transcript discusses the disappointment over the lack of amendments giving Parliament more say in Brexit negotiations. It highlights the importance of a meaningful vote and the potential for legal action if promises are not kept. The speaker emphasizes the unrealistic timeline for Brexit and the need for a proper debate in Parliament. The discussion also covers the complexities of the Brexit process, the role of business leaders, and the uncertainty in the political landscape.

What was the main concern regarding the amendments that were not added to the bill?

• They would have increased taxes.

• They would have given Parliament more control.

• They would have reduced the voting age.

• They would have changed the election date.

Why is a two-year timeline considered unrealistic for Brexit negotiations?

• It does not allow for public opinion.

• It conflicts with other international agreements.

• It is too long and costly.

• It is too short to address complex issues.

What is the speaker's primary concern if the government bypasses Parliament?

• Increased taxes

• Parliamentary sovereignty

• Public opinion

• International relations

What does the speaker hope for in terms of support for future legal actions?

• More funding from the government

• Increased public awareness and support

• Support from international organizations

• Assistance from political parties

What is the speaker's view on the potential impact of Mrs. May's version of leaving the EU?

• It is the best option available.

• It will improve international relations.

• It will strengthen the economy.

• It needs to be debated thoroughly.