What Blinken-Xi Meeting Means for American Businesses

What Blinken-Xi Meeting Means for American Businesses

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses Secretary Blinken's meetings in Beijing, highlighting the importance of business relations between the US and China. It addresses challenges faced by businesses in China, including policy uncertainties and due diligence issues. The concept of derisking versus decoupling is explored, with insights into how companies are adjusting their strategies in response to geopolitical changes.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the significance of Secretary Blinken's meeting with President Xi for American businesses?

It indicated a potential trade war.

It was a routine diplomatic meeting with no impact.

It showed a decline in diplomatic relations.

It signaled that American business was welcome in China.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was identified as the number one pain point for companies in the MGM China survey?

COVID-19 restrictions

Supply chain disruptions

US-China relations

High operational costs

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a major concern for companies conducting due diligence in China?

Currency fluctuations

Lack of skilled labor

Crossing the red line of national security data

High taxation rates

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the difference between derisking and decoupling in the context of US-China trade?

Derisking involves reducing dependency, while decoupling means complete separation.

Derisking focuses on political relations, while decoupling focuses on cultural exchanges.

Derisking is a short-term strategy, while decoupling is a long-term strategy.

Derisking is about increasing investments, while decoupling is about reducing them.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What percentage of companies indicated they are not planning to move their supply chains out of China?

70%

60%

80%

50%