Trump Weighs Revoking Clearances of Comey, Brennan, Other Critics

The transcript discusses the controversy surrounding the politicization of national security clearances, particularly for former officials critical of President Trump. It highlights the lack of specific allegations against these individuals and the President's latitude in granting clearances. The discussion also covers the unclear status of clearances for some ex-officials, noting that it is often a matter of courtesy. The transcript concludes with the uncertainty about how many still hold clearances and their relevance.

What is the common factor among the former officials mentioned in the first section?

• They have all leaked classified information.

• They have been supportive of President Trump.

• They have been critical of President Trump.

• They have all been reappointed to their positions.

What is the expected role of political views in the security clearance process?

• Political views should not influence the process.

• Political views should be ignored only for CIA directors.

• Political views should be the main criterion.

• Only positive political views should be considered.

What action can the President take against critics regarding security briefings?

• Ignore their criticisms completely.

• Promote them to higher positions.

• Declare them persona non grata for briefings.

• Grant them additional security clearances.

Why do some former officials still have security clearances?

• It is a matter of courtesy for ex-officials.

• They are still actively working in their roles.

• They have requested to keep their clearances.

• They have been rehired by the administration.

What happened to Andrew McCabe's security clearance?

• It was suspended as per FBI policy.

• It was renewed by the administration.

• It was upgraded by the FBI.

• It was unaffected by his firing.