Think White Paper Was Wrongly Worded: Midgley

The video discusses the unprecedented level of civil disobedience in Hong Kong, focusing on the legal and political aspects of protests. It highlights the authorities' response, including the use of tear gas, and the subsequent public reaction. The discussion also delves into the role of Basic Law, the implications of a controversial white paper, and the independence of the judiciary. The video concludes with a reflection on the importance of language in legal documents and the ongoing demand for universal suffrage.

What are the two main aspects discussed regarding the protests in Hong Kong?

• Environmental and health aspects

• Political and technical legality aspects

• Economic and social aspects

• Cultural and historical aspects

How did the authorities initially respond to the protests?

• By negotiating with protestors

• By using tear gas and pepper spray

• By ignoring the protests

• By immediately granting permits

What change in police tactics was observed following the initial response?

• Increased use of force

• Withdrawal and less imposing presence

• Complete withdrawal from the streets

• Deployment of military forces

What is the irony mentioned in relation to the protests and the Basic Law?

• The Basic Law is unrelated to the protests

• The Basic Law was never implemented

• The protests are about economic issues

• The protests are centered around a law meant to protect them

What was a major concern regarding China's White Paper?

• It was not translated into English

• It was seen as interfering with Hong Kong's legal independence

• It was too short

• It was praised by all legal experts