Thomas Conliffe is challenging NHS North Staffordshire's refusal to fund his obesity surgery due to his body mass index not meeting their criteria. He argues that the surgery would improve his life expectancy and reduce medical costs. His legal team claims the NHS failed to consider his social circumstances, infringing on his human rights. The Royal College of Surgeons supports surgery for significant weight loss, but NHS policies vary. If the court rules in Conliffe's favor, it could lead to increased demands for similar treatments, impacting NHS resources.

Why was Thomas Conliffe denied obesity surgery by NHS North Staffordshire?

• He did not meet the BMI threshold.

• He refused to pay for the surgery.

• He had already undergone the surgery.

• He was not a resident of North Staffordshire.

What did Thomas Conliffe claim the surgery would improve?

• His career prospects.

• His social life.

• His ability to travel.

• His life expectancy and medical costs.

What did Conliffe's lawyers argue was infringed by denying him surgery?

• His freedom of speech.

• His educational opportunities.

• His human rights.

• His financial stability.

What does the Royal College of Surgeons say about the effectiveness of the surgery?

• It is not recommended for anyone.

• It is only effective for short-term weight loss.

• It helps patients lose more than half of their excess weight within a year.

• It is ineffective for long-term weight loss.

What might happen if the court rules against the NHS?

• Many other patients may demand previously denied treatments.

• The NHS will expand its services.

• The NHS will stop all surgeries.

• The NHS will increase funding for all treatments.