Businessman fined for humiliating thief

Simon Creamer confronted Mark Gilbert for forging a check, leading to a legal battle. Creamer restrained Gilbert and made him wear a placard, resulting in a £34,000 bill for damages and legal costs. The court found Creamer guilty, sparking public debate and a campaign supporting him. Creamer reflects on the financial and moral implications of his actions, realizing that justice should be left to the police and courts.

What action did Simon Creamer take against Mark Gilbert?

• He reported him to the police.

• He tied his hands and made him wear a placard.

• He forgave him and let him go.

• He took him to court.

What was the financial consequence faced by Simon Creamer?

• No financial consequence

• A £10,000 fine

• A £34,000 bill

• A £50,000 compensation

What did the judge criticize about Simon Creamer's actions?

• His leniency towards Gilbert

• His heavy-handed approach

• His decision to involve the police

• His lack of evidence

What legal outcome did Mark Gilbert face?

• No legal action

• A heavy fine

• A police caution

• A prison sentence

What is Simon Creamer's stance on his actions despite the consequences?

• He regrets his actions entirely.

• He stands by his moral decision.

• He believes the punishment was fair.

• He plans to take further legal action.