CLEAN : Kenya media condemn draconian parliamentary press law

The video discusses the challenges posed by criminal defamation laws in Kenya, which threaten media freedom and accountability. It highlights constitutional protections against such laws and emphasizes the need for accountability in governance. The video calls for the abolition of criminal defamation laws, arguing that existing legal frameworks like the Media Act 2013 are sufficient to regulate journalism ethically.

What is the main concern regarding the reintroduction of criminal defamation laws in Kenya?

• They are supported by the Constitution.

• They may lead to increased taxes.

• They could silence critical reporting.

• They will improve media freedom.

Why is accountability considered essential in a democratic society?

• It supports criminal defamation.

• It increases the power of leaders.

• It helps in assessing the rule of law.

• It reduces media freedom.

What is the argument against using criminal defamation to suppress accountability?

• It is a new legal requirement.

• It is supported by the Constitution.

• It undermines democracy.

• It enhances the rule of law.

Which existing law is mentioned as sufficient to regulate journalism in Kenya?

• The Complaints Commission Act

• The Media Act 2013

• The Constitution of Kenya

• The Taxpayer Act

What is the call to action regarding media freedom in Kenya?

• To introduce more criminal defamation laws

• To protect the rights and privileges of journalists

• To increase taxes on media outlets

• To silence critical reporting